| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
#Theistic-Evolution
| Traditional Art / Drawings / Animals | ©2010-2013 *Eurwentala |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
And yes, that's how they had their hands, at least according to fossilized footprints and Mark Witton: [link]
It's weird, but goes with the data.
Adding to the weirdess of pterosaur locomotion, they actually had plantigrade hindlimbs instead of standing on their toes like quite much all other diapsids. That's where this drawing goes wrong, but it's clear from the footprints.
And I agree with you. Maybe it's because of their absurd proportions, and, of course, huge size.
I think 'beak' is the closest word available.
Yeah, me too.